About Wilkie Collins
topAbout the Book
topWilkie Collins interview/review
How I wrote “The Woman In White” by Wilkie Collins Extracted from the essay How I Write My Books , first published in The Globe , 1887
My first proceeding is to get my central idea — the pivot on which the story turns.
The central idea of The Woman In White is the idea of a conspiracy in private life, in which circumstances are so handled as to rob a woman of her identity by confounding her with another woman, sufficiently like her in personal appearance to answer the wicked purpose. The destruction of her identity represents a first division of the story; the recovery of her identity marks a second division.
My central idea suggests some of my chief characters. A clever devil must conduct the conspiracy. Male devil? or female devil? The sort of wickedness wanted seems to be a man’s wickedness. Perhaps a foreign man. Count Fosco faintly shows himself to me, before I know his name. I let him wait, and begin to think about the two women. They must be both innocent and both interesting.
Lady Glyde dawns on me as one of the innocent victims. I try to discover the other — and fail. I try what a walk will do for me — and fail. I devote the evening to a new effort — and fail. Experience tells me to take no more trouble about it, and leave that other woman to come of her own accord. The next morning, before I have been awake in my bed for more than ten minutes, my perverse brains set to work without consulting me. Poor Anne Catherick comes into the room, and says: ‘Try me’.
I have got my idea; I have got three of my characters. What is there to do now? My next proceeding is to begin building up the story.
Here, my favourite three efforts must be encountered. First effort: to begin at the beginning. Second effort: to keep the story always advancing, without paying the smallest attention to the serial division in parts, or to the book publications in volumes.
Third effort: to decide on the end. All this is done, as my father used to paint his skies in his famous sea-pieces, at one heat. As yet, I do not enter into details; I merely set up my landmarks. In doing this the main situations of the story present themselves; and, at the same time I see my characters in all sorts of new aspects. These discoveries lead me nearer and nearer to finding the right end. The end being decided on, I go back again to the beginning, and look at it with a new eye, and fail to be satisfied with it. I have yielded to the worst temptation that besets a novelist — the temptation to begin with a striking incident, without counting the cost in the shape of explanations that must, and will follow.
These pests of fiction, to reader and writer alike, can only be eradicated in one way. I have already mentioned the way — to begin at the beginning. In the case of The Woman In White , I get back (as I vainly believe) to the true starting point of the story. I am now at liberty to set the new novel going; having, let me repeat, no more than an outline of story and characters before me, and leaving the details, in each case to the spur of the moment.
For a week, as well as I can remember, I work for the best part of every day, but not as happily as usual. An unpleasant sense of something wrong worries me. At the beginning of the second week, a disheartening discovery reveals itself. I have not found the right beginning of The Woman In White yet.
The scene of my opening chapters is in Cumberland. Miss Fairlie (afterwards Lady Glyde); Mr. Fairlie, with his irritable nerves and his art-treasures; Miss Halcombe (discovered suddenly, like Anne Catherick), are all waiting the arrival of the young drawing-master, Walter Hartright. No: this won’t do. The person to be first introduced is Anne Catherick. She must be already a familiar figure to the reader, when the reader accompanies me to Cumberland. This is what must be done, but I don’t see how to do it; no new idea comes to me; I and my manuscript have quarrelled, and don’t speak to each other.
One evening, I happen to read of a lunatic who has escaped from an asylum — a paragraph of a few lines only, in a newspaper. Instantly the idea comes to me of Walter Hartright’s midnight meeting with Anne Catherick, escaped from the asylum. The Woman In White begins again; and nobody will ever be half as much interested in it now, as I am. From that moment, I have done with my miseries. For the next six months the pen goes on; it is work, hard work; but the harder the better, for this excellent reason: the work is its own exceeding great reward.
As an example of the gradual manner in which I reach the development of character, I may return for a moment to Fosco. The making him fat was an after-thought; his canaries and his white mice were found next; and the most valuable discovery of all, his admiration of Miss Halcombe, took its rise in a conviction that he would not be true to nature unless there was some weak point somewhere in his character.
My last difficulty tried me, after the story had been finished, and part of it had been set in proof for serial publication in All The Year Round . Neither I, nor any friend whom I consulted, could find the right title. Literally, at the eleventh hour, I thought of The Woman In White . In various quarters, this was declared to be a vile melodramatic title that would ruin the book. Among the very few friends who encouraged me, the first and foremost was Charles Dickens. ‘Are you too disappointed?’ I said to him. ‘Nothing of the sort, Wilkie! A better title there cannot be’.
topStarting Points for Discussion
- ‘This the story of what a Woman’s patience can endure, and what a Man’s resolution can achieve.’ (p 3) Do you think the opening sentence of The Woman in White is a fair or accurate summary of the novel? Why do you think Collins chose to frame the novel this way?
- Who do you think is the true heroine of the novel, Laura or Marian? Who do you find the more attractive character?
- Who do you think is the worst villain, Sir Percival Glyde, Count Fosco, or Mr Fairlie?
- ‘ “ After all that we three have suffered together”, she said, “there can be no parting between us till the last parting of all. My heart and my happiness, Walter, are with Laura and you.”’ The Woman in White , page 603 Some critics have described the end of the novel as almost a ménage à trois, and have compared it to Collins’ own unusual domestic setup at the end of his life. Do you agree with this characterisation of the relationship between Walter, Marian and Laura? Do you find it unusual as an ending?
- The Moonstone (1868) is frequently called ‘the first true detective novel’. Do you think The Woman in White also has elements of a detective novel?
- The story is told through multiple viewpoints, with sections by both Walter and Marian, as well as their lawyer and Mrs Catherick. What is the effect of this and why do you think Collins chose to tell the story in this way?
- ‘Apart from my books—my life presents no events which have any claim to on the public interest, or on your attention.’ Wilkie Collins, 1862. Do you think that knowing about an author’s life is useful or interesting when reading their novels, or should the text be allowed to stand alone? What does a knowledge of Collins’ life add to a reading of The Woman in White?
Other Books by Wilkie Collins

No Name
After the tragic deaths of their parents, Magdalen and Norah discover the d…

The Moonstone
WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY AUDREY NIFFENEGGER When Rachel Verinder receives a …

The Woman in White
Marian and her sister Laura live a quiet life under their uncle s guardianship…
Suggested Further Reading
- The Moonstone ~ Wilkie Collins (Vintage Classics)
- Fingersmith ~ Sarah Waters (Virago)
- The Woman in Black ~ Susan Hill (Vintage Classics)
- Bleak House ~ Charles Dickens (Penguin Classics)
- The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes ~ Arthur Conan Doyle (Oxford World Classics), in particular the short story The Speckled Band.
Additional Online Resources
The Wilki Collins site Contains the text of his will and a fascinating chronological collection of photographs and drawings of Wilkie Collins.
A good short biography and details of his formative relationship with Charles Dickens.
An excellent longer biography, as well as details and plot summaries for his books and novels.
top